You are here

Home » Content

TÜRK ÇOCUKLARINDA ORTODONTİK TEDAVİ İHTİYACI VE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İ NCELENMESİ

THE EXAMINATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT NEED AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN TURKISH CHILDREN

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The aim of this research is to examine the associated with between orthodontic treatment need and quality of life (QoL) in Turkish children and to stress the association of this relation with some variables such as sociodemographic (age, gender, social class) factors, the level of orthodontic treatment need, frequency of visiting a dentist and treatment will. Material and Methods: Study group was consisted of 178 children who were between ages of 11 and 14, and had orthodontic treatment need. Control group was consisted of 100 children who had no or negligible orthodontic problems. Dental Health Component (DHC) of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was based to establish the orthodontic treatment need of every individual. To determine the effect of this need on QoL, shortened 16 items version Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQn-M) and Child-Oral Impact of Daily Performance (Child-OIDP) index were used. Results: The results reveal that the averages of total QoL in study group is statistically significant lower than the control group for both questionnaires (p<0.05). Significantly lower QoL averages were experienced in CPQ11-14 questionnaires only in emotional and social well being domains, and in Child OIDP questionnaire only in smiling, emotional stability and social contact domains when compared control groups with study groups (p<0.05). Besides, statistically significant differences were determined in answers to the questions regarding the frequency of visiting a dentist and treatment will (p<0.05). Conclusion: The orthodontic treatment need significantly affects the QoL of school children in Erzurum, Turkey. However; this situation is associated with not the physical activities but with psychological activities of the child. It can be argued that the sub-titles such as oral symptoms and functional limitations of quality of life surveys with regard to oral health are not associated with orthodontics patients.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı Türk çocuklarında yaşam kalitesi (QoL) ile ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkinin sosyodemografik faktörler (yaş, cinsiyet, sosyal sınıf), ortodontik tedavi ihtiyaç seviyesi, diş hekimi ziyaret sıklığı ve tedavi isteği ile olan ilişkisini vurgulamaktır. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışma gurubu ortodontik tedaviye ihtiyaç duyan ve yaşları 11 ile 14 arasında değişen 178 çocuktan, kontrol gurubu ise ortodontik problemi olmayan ya da ihmal edilebilecek seviyede ortodontik problem yaşayan 100 çocuktan oluşmaktaydı. Her bireyin ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacını belirlemek için Ortodontik Tedavi İhtiyaç İndeksinin (IOTN) Diş Sağlığı Bileşeni (DHC) esas alındı. Yaşam kalitesi üzerine bu ihtiyacın etkisini belirlemek için kısaltılmış 16 maddelik CPQ11-14 anketi ve Child-OIDP indexi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Mevcut araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre çalışma gurubundaki total yaşam kalitesi ortalamaları her iki ankette de kontrol gurubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha düşüktür (p<0.05). Kontrol gurubu ile karşılaştırıldığında çalışma gurubunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı daha düşük yaşam kalitesi ortalamaları CPQ11-14 anketinde sadece emasyonel ve sosyal iyilik alanlarında; Child OIDP anketinde ise yalnızca gülümseme, emasyonel stabilite ve sosyal iletişim başlıkları altında tespit edilmiştir (p<0.05). Bunun yanında tedavi isteği ve diş hekimi ziyaret sıklığı sorularına verilen cevaplara bağlı oluşan yaşam kalitesi ortalamalarında da anlamlı farklılıklar belirlenmiştir (p<0.05). Sonuç: Ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı Türkiye'nin Erzurum ilindeki okul çağı çocuklarında yaşam kalitesini anlamlı şekilde etkilemektedir. Bununla birlikte bu etki fiziksel değil sadece psikolojik aktiviteler ile ilgilidir. Bu noktadan hareketle kullanılan oral sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesi anketlerinin oral semptomlar ve fonksiyonel limitasyonlar gibi alt başlıklarının ortodonti hastaları ile alakalı olmadığı da düşünülebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turk-cocuklarinda-ortodontik-tedavi-ihtiyaci-yasam-kalitesi-arasindaki-iliskinin-i-ncelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
8-13
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Inglehart MR, Bagramian RA. ,editors. Oral Health-related Quality of Life. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 2002. pp. 111-21.
2. Fernandes MJ, Ruta DA, Ogden GR, Pitts NB, Ogston SA. Assessing oral health-related quality of life in general dental practice in Scotland: validation of the OHIP-14. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006;34:53-62.
3. Hegarty AM, McGrath C, Hodsgon TA, Porter SR. Patient-centred outcome measures in oral medicine: are they valid and reliable? Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 2002;31:670-4.
4. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care.
BMJ 2000;320:526-7.
12
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt:19, Sayı: 1, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 8-13
MİLOĞLU, ÇAĞLAYAN,
KAZANCI
,
ALTUN, KAYA
5. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod
1989;11:309-20.
6. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res 2002;81:459-63.
7. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11-14-year-old children (CPQ11-14): development and initial evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;19:4:4.
8. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community
Dent Health 2004;21:161-9.
9. Pal D. Quality of life assessment in children: a review of conceptual and methodological issues in multidimensional health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50: 391-6.
10. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod 2004;31:20-7.
11. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J
Orthod 1995;17:505-12.
12. Zhou YH, Hagg U, Rabie AB. Severity of dentofacial deformity, the motivations and the outcome of surgery in skeletal Class III patients. Chin Med J 2002;115:1031-4.
13. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: a 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1985;87:110-8.
14. Hawker DS, Boulton MJ. Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychological maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross sectional studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
2000;41:441-55.
15. Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129: 424-7.
16. O'Brien K, Kay L, Mandall N. Assessing oral health outcomes for orthodontics measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health
1998;15:22-6.
17. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C, Sheiham A. Prevalence, intensity and extent of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances associated with self-perceived malocclusion in 11-12-year-old children. BMC Oral Health 2007;7:6.
18. Tajima M, Kohzuki M, Azuma S, Saeki S, Meguro M, Sugawara J. Difference in quality of life according to the severity of malocclusion in Japanese orthodontic patients. Tohoku J Exp Med
2007;212:71-80.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com