You are here

Home » Content

MARYLAND KÖPR Ü TUTUCULUĞUNUN GENÇ SÜREKLİ VE SÜT DİŞLERİNDE ARAŞTIRILMASI

INVESTIGATION OF MARYLAND BRIDGE RETENTION ON YOUNG PERMANENT AND PRIMARY TEETH

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1991

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, electrolytically etched alloy frameworks were bonded to 40 young permanent and 40 primary teeth etched for 60 or 120 seconds, and the retention is evaluated by shear strength tests. It hs found that there were no significant differences in the breaking loads and in the types of bond break values obtained in the both etched young permanent and primary teeth for different time intervals. Furthermore, it is obser ved that the most failures were occured in the resm-enamel interface, and the electrolytic etching technique applied has been determined to be sujjicient enough for the retention of the specific alloy used. The retention bond strength values obtained in this study support the application of etched casting resin bonded bridges as a restoration method for both the young permanent and primary dentition.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, 60 saniye ya da 120 saniye süre ile asitlenen 40 genç sürekli ve 40 süt dişine elektrolitik asitle-me yapılan döküm metal kanatlar uygulanarak, tutuculuk kuvvet deneyleri ile değerlendirildi. Genç sürekli Ve süt dişlerinin asitlenme sürelerindeki farklılığın kg-kopma değerlerinde ve kopma yüzey cinsi sıklıklarında anlamlı farklar oluşturmadığı, başarısızlıkların da en çok mine-reçine yüzeyinden kaynaklandığı saptandı. Metal yüzeylere uygulanan elektrolitik asitleme yönteminin ise yeterli olduğu görüldü. Genç sürekli vc süt dişlerinde tutuculuk ile ilgili elde edilen bulguların Maryland köprülerin çocuklarda uygu^ lanabilirliğini destekleyici nitelikte olduğu sonucuna varıldı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-maryland-kopr-u-tutuculugunun-genc-surekli-sut-dislerinde-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 4
169
175
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Abbot, DM, Harrington, W.G.: Management of the isolated deformed dentinoalveolar complex by subepithelial graft and resin-bonded fixed partial denture, J.Am.Dent.Assoc, 113:65, 1986.
2. Aksu, MM, Powers, J.M., Lorey, R.E., Kolling, J.N.: Variables affecting bond strength of resin bonded bridge cements. J.Dent.Res. 65:238, abstract no.615, 1986.
3. Barnes, R.F., Moon, P.C.: Shear bond strength ana film thickness of composite bonding agents. J.Dent.Res. (Special Issue} 65:257, abstract no. 788. 1986.
' 4. Barrack, G.: Recent advances in etched cast restorations. J.Prosthet.Dent. 52: 619, 1984.
5. Brady, T., Doukoudakis, A., Rasmussen, S.T.: Experimental comparison between perforated and etched-metal resin-bonded retainers. J.Prosthet.Dent. 54: 361, 1985.
6. Brantley, C.F., Kanoy, B.E., Sturdevant, J.R.: Thermal effects on retention of resin bonded retainers. DentMater. 2:67, 1986.
7. Breusch, F.L.,
Ukısoy, E.: Genel ve Anorganik Kimya, Fatih Yayınevi Matbaası, İstanbul 1981.
8. Cassidy, AJ„ Storie, D.Q.: Saliva contamination and resin bonding of etched metal retainers. J.Prosthet, Dent. 57:29, 1987.
Maryland
Köprü
Tutuculuğunun Genç Sürekli ve Süt Dişlerinde Araştırılması
175
9. Caughman, W.F., Comer, R.W., Duncan, J.D.: Combining resinbonded prostheses and removable partial dentures, report of case. J.Am.Dent.Assoc. 114: 187, 1987.
10. de Kanter, R.J.AM, Creugers, N.H.J., Snoek, P.A.: Restorative alternatives in the replacement of maxillary anterior teeth with diastemata. Quintessence Int. 17: 35, 1986.
11. Denehy. G.E.: Cast anterior bridges utilizing composite resin. Pediatr.Dent. 4:44, 1982.
12. Forbes, J.F., Horn, J.S.: Characterization of bonding composites fortwo types of metal retainers. J.Dent.Res. 63:320, abstract no. 1347, 1984.
13. Gibbs.C, Wickwire, N.A., Jacobson, A.P., Lunde-en, H.C., Mahan, P.E., Lupkiewicz, S.M.: Comparison oi typical chewing patterns in normal children and adults. J.Am.Dent.Assoc. 105:33, 1982.
14. Hamada, T, Shigeto, N„ Yanagihara, T: A decade of progress for the adhesive fixed partial denture. J.Prosthet.Dent. 54:24, 1985.
15. Holland, W. and others: Selected properties of four cements for resin bonded-bridge application. J.Indiana Dent Assoc. 63:9, 1984.
16. Hormati, A.A., Denehy, G.E., Fuiler,J.L: Retenti-veness of enamel-resin bonds using unfilled and filled resins. J.DentRes. 47:502, 1982.
17. Howe, D.F., Denehy, G.E.: Anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast metal framework. J.Prosthet.Dent.37:28, 1977.
18. Howell, A.H., Manly, R.S.: Electronic strain gauge for measuring oral forcesJ.Dent.Res. 27:705, 1948.
19. Hudgins, J.L., Moon, P.C., Knap,F.J.: Particle-roughened resin-bonded retainers. J.Prosthet.Dent. 53:471, 1985.
20. Jackson, T.R., Healey, K.W.: Chairside electrolytic etching of cast alloys for resin bonding. J.Prosthet Dent. 54: 764, 1985.
21. Jordan, R.D., Aquilino, S.A., Krell, K.V.:Acid-etched splinting to a ceramometai abutment. J.Prosthet.Dent. 55:567, 1986.
22. Lambert, P.M., Moore, D.L, Eilestoo, H.H: In vitro retentive strength of fixed bridges constructed with acrylic
ontics and an ultraviolet-tight-polymerized resin. J.Am.Dent.Assoc. 92: 740, 1976.
• 23. Levine, W.A.: Physical properties of resin luting cements. J.Dent.Res. (Special Issue) 65:256, abstract no. 786, 1986.
24. Livaditis, G.J.: Cast metal resin-bonded retainers for posterior teeth. J.Am.Dent.Assoc. 101:926, 1980.
25. Livaditis, G.J.: Etched-metal resin-bonded intia-coronal cast restorations. Part I: The attachment mechanism. J.Prosthet.Dent. 56:267, 1986.
26. Livaditis, G.J., Thompson, V.P.: Etched casting: An improved mechanism for resin bonded retainers. J.Prosthet. Dent. 47:52, 1982.
27. Meetz, H: Comparison of commercially available cementing resin metarials for the Maryland Bridge. J.Dent Res. 62:220, abstract no. 458, 1983.
28. Mitchem, J.C., Turner, L.R.: The retentive strengths of acid-ecthed retained resins.J.Am.Dent.As-soc. 89:1107, 1974..
29. Mohi, G., Mehra, R.: Clinical evaluation ofetcheo metal resin bonded bridges. J.Dent.Res. (Special Issue) 65:311, abstract no. 1278, 1986.
30. Rider, M.: The shear strength of enamel-composite bonds. J.Dent. 5:237, 1977.
31. Simonsen,R., Thompson, V., Barrack, G.:Etcheo Cast Restorations: Clinical and Laboratory Techniques, Quintessance Publishing Co., Chicago, 1983.
32. Thompson, V.P., Castillo, E.D., Livaditis, G.J.: Resin bonded retainers. Part 1: Resin bond to electrolyticaiiy etched nonprecious alloys. J.Prosthet.Dent. 50: 771, 1983.
33. Thompson, V.P., Livaditis, G.J.: Etched casting acid etch composite bonded posterior bridges. Paediatr. Dent. 4:38, 182.
34. Wendt, S.L, Covington, J.S.: The use of light-cured composites to cement acid-etched fixed partial dentures. J.Prosthet.Dent. 55:578, 1986.
35. Zardiackas, L.D., Caughman, F.W., Comer, R.W., Lentz, D.L: Tensile adhesion of two Maryland bridge cements to two base metal alloys. J.Dent.Res. (Special Issue) 65:257, abstract no. 791, 1986.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com