You are here

Home » Content

İLKÖĞRETİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FEN BİLGİSİ DERSİNE BAKIŞ AÇILARINI BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The opinions of the students for the science are related to meet their needs and expectations. If the content The study that seeks the answer to the question what the elementary school students think about science course, is aimed to find out the level of the their expectations. This study was applied to the 321 students attending 6th , 7th, and 8th Key Words: Science education, viewpoint to science, scientific thinking, elementary school in four different schools in the 2003-2004 school year. The questionnaire technique was used to obtain the data. Likert scale which consists of 30 questions was analyzed by comparing of the groups. The result of the research indicates that the interest of the girls to the science course is higher than the boys. It is also stated that the level of the students attending to the schools in the city center is higher than the ones in the out skirt.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi hakkında ne düşündükleri sorusunun cevabını araştıran bu çalışma, öğrencilerin beklentilerinin karşılanma düzeyini ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, 2003-2004 eğitim-öğretim yılında dört farklı ilköğretim 6, 7 ve 8. sınıfta fen bilgisi dersini alan 321 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Örneklemden veri toplamak için anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, örneklemden verilerin toplanması için 30 sorudan oluşan likert ölçek kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sunucunda, kız öğrencilerin fen bilgisine bakış açısının erkek öğrencilere göre daha olumlu olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, şehir merkezi dışındaki okulda eğitim gören öğrencilerin fen bilgisine bakış açılarının şehir merkezindeki öğrencilere göre daha düşük düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-ogrencilerinin-fen-bilgisi-dersine-bakis-acilarini-belirlemeye-yonelik-bir-arastirma.pdf
  • 1
339-346
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Fidan, N. & Erden, M. (1997). Eğitime Giriş, Alkım Yayınevi, İstanbul.
2. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J. & Zeidler, D.L. (1993). A summary of research in science education-1991, ERIC/CSMEE Publication, The Ohio State University, USA.
3. Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1996). Children’s Science, (Ed: Osborne, R., Freyberg, P.,) Learning in science: The implications of children’s science, Heinemann Education, Hong Kong.
4. Howe, A. C. & Jones, L. (1998). Engaging Children in Science, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
5. Senemoğlu, N. (2001). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim, Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
6. Thomas, G.P. (2003). Conceptualization, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the meta-cognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: the meta-cognitive orientations learning environment scale-science (moles-s), Learning Environments Research, 6, 175-197.
7. Başaran, İ.E. (1996). Eğitim Psikolojisi, Eğitimin Psikolojik Temelleri, Gül Yayınevi, Ankara.
346 Süleyman YAMAN, Feda ÖNER
Mart 2006 Cilt:14 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
8. McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H., Clough, M.P (1998). The nature of science education an instruction, Science & Education, 7, 511-532.
9. Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, A. (1998). Children’s ideas and the learning of science, Children’s Ideas Science, Open University Press, Buckingham, Great Britain, 1-9.
10. Shepardson, D.P. (1997). The nature of student thinking in life science laboratories, School Science & Mathematics, 97 (1), 37-44.
11. Kaptan, F. (1999). Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi, Öğretmen Kitapları Dizisi, MEB Yayınları, İstanbul.
12. Nokelainen, P. & Ruohotie, P. (2000). Modern modeling of student motivation and self-regulated learning, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Assoc., New Orleans, USA.
13. Markova, D. & Powell, A. (2002). Çocuklar Nasıl Öğrenir?, Kuraldışı Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
14. Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14 (2), 169-175.
15. Selçuk, Z. (2001). Gelişim ve Öğrenme, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
16. Griffiths, A.K. & Barry, M. (1991). Secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of science, (Ed: Forgasz, H.) Research in Science Education, Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Queensland, Australia.
17. Enger, S.G., & Yager, R.E. (1998). The Iowa Assessment Handbook, The Iowa SS&C Project, Science Education Center of The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
18. Ornstein, A.C. & Lasley, T.J. (2000). Strategies for Effective Teaching, Third Edition, The McGraw-Hill Companies, USA.
19. Flick, L.B. (1995). Complex instruction in complex classroom: a synthesis of research on inquiry teaching methods and explicit teaching strategies, The Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, April 22-25, USA.
20. Black, P. & Simon, S. (1992). Progression in learning science, Ed: Gardner, P. L., Research in Science Education, Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Hamilton, New Zealand.
21. Arlı, M. & Nazik, M. H. (2001). Bilimsel Araştırmaya Giriş, Gazi Kitapevi, Ankara.
22. McMillan, J. H. (2000). Edu. Research, Fundamentals for the Consumer, Longman, USA.
23. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education, 5th
24. Arseven, A. D. (1994). Alan Araştırma Yöntemi, İlkeler Teknikler Örnekler, Gül Yayınevi, Ank. Edition, Routhledge-Falmer, London.
25. Taylor, P.C., Fraser, B.J. & White, L.R. (1994). CLES: An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
26. Korkmaz, H. (2002). Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin yaratıcı düşünme, problem çözme ve akademik risk alma düzeylerine etkisi, Yayımlanmamış Dokt. Tezi, H.Ü. Sos. Bil. Enst., Ank.
27. Boyle, E.A., Duffy, T., Dunleavy, K. (2003). Learning styles and academic outcome: the validity and utility of Vermunt’s inventory of learning styles in a British higher education setting, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 267–290.
28. Yore, L.D., Shymansky, J.A., Henriques, L., Hand, B.M., Dunkhase, J.A. & Lewis, J.O. (1998). Students’ perception of science teaching and attitudes toward science learning and teachers self-report of using children’s ideas, applications of science, and use of print resources as indicators of interactive-constructivist teaching in elementary schools, (Ed: Rubba, P.A. & Rye, J.A.), Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Minneapolis, USA.
29. O’Donnell, D.G. (1994). Creating an Environment for Learning Disabilities: A Resource and Planning Guide, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, USA.
30. Tepe, D. (1999). Öğrencilerin fen dersine karşı tutumları ile başarıları arasındaki ilişki, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com