You are here

Home » Content

TÜRKÇE ADIL BAĞIMLILIKLARI ÜZERİNE BAZI NOTLAR.

SOME NOTES ON TURKISH PRONOMINAL ANAPHORA

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2010
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.1775

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article discusses the distributional properties of the pronominal expressions in Turkish in light of the Binding theory proposed by Chomsky (1980, 1982, 1986) and developed in various dimensions throughout the Generative enterprise. The following questions are raised: (i) How are the anaphoric relations reflected in syntax? (ii) How does anaphora appear in Turkish? (iii) Can Binding theory explain the Turkish facts? I propose that the Binding theory Conditions A and B seem to be inadequate in explaining the anaphoricsystem of T u r k i s h given that (i) T u r k i s h seems to have a three-partite system instead of pronoun-anaphor complementarity, and (ii) the idea that Turkish has a specifiable minimal domain where the binding operation applies is problematic i n a number of respects. I propose that Turkish distinguishes between forms which have only variable interpretation (kendi) and forms which have only deictic interpretation (personal pronouns). kendisi is a special form which combines these interpretations and licensed i n accordance with the presence/absence of an A'- operator.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede Türkçedeki adılların tümce içerisinde kurduğu bağımlılıklar Chomsky (1980, 1982, 1986) tarafından ortaya atılan ve Üretici dilbilgisi çerçevesinde geliştirilen Bağlama kuramı ışığında tartışılmaktadır. Makalede Bağlama kuramı koşullarının Türkçenin kimi yapılarını açıklayamayacağı iki neden etrafında savunulmaktadır: (i) Türkçede Bağlama kuramının öngördüğü kişi adılı-dönüşlü adıl ayrımı yerine üçlü bir ayrım göze çarpmaktadır. (ii) Türkçede dönüşlü adılın işleneceği bir en küçük alan oluşturmak olanaksızdır. Makale bu anlamda sadece bağlı değişken okumasına sahip olan kendi ve sadece gösterici okumaya sahip olan kişi adılları arasında bir ayrım önermekte, kendisi adılının özel bir dağılıma sahip olup bu iki okumayı birleştirdiğini ve tümce içerisindeki bir işleyici tarafından işlendiğini savunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkce-adil-bagimliliklari-uzerine-bazi-notlar.pdf
  • 4
535-563
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ARSLAN, Ceyda (2006) Case as an Uninterpretable Feature,
Boğaziçi
University
, Ph.D. Dissertation.
AYGEN, Gülşat
(2002
) Finiteness, Case and Clausal Architecture,
Harvard University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2002.
BOECKX, Cedric (2003) Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
BOECKX, Cedric (2008) Bare Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1980) "On Binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 1¬46.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
CHOMSKY, Noam (1986) Barriers, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
CSATÖ,
Ev
a Agnes, & JOHANSON, Lars (1998) "Turkish", (Ed.)
Lars Johanson & Eva Agnes Csatö, The Turkic languages, Routledge, London & New York, 202-235.
DECHAINE, R-M. & MANFREDI, V. (1994) "Binding Domains in Haitian", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12,
203-257.
DECHAINE, R-M. & WILTSCHKO, M. (2002) "Decomposing Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 409-442.
DECHAINE, R-M. & WILTSCHKO, M. (2004) "Dissolving
Condition A", GLOW, April 2004. Thessaloniki.
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature
and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 5/4 Fall 2010
Some Notes On Turkish... 561
ENÇ, Mürvet
(1986
) "Topic Switching and Pronominal Subjects in Turkish". (Ed.) D. I. Slobin, and Karl Zimmer, Studies in Turkish Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 195-208.
ERGUVANLI-TAYLAN, Eser (1986) "Pronominal versus Zero Representation of Anaphora in Turkish", (Ed.) D. I. Slobin, and Karl Zimmer, Studies in Turkish Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and
Philadelphia, 209-231.
GÖKSEL, Aslı
&
KERSLAKE, Celia (2005) Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HORNSTEIN, Norbert (2001) "Control in GB and Minimalism", Ms., University of Maryland.
HORNSTEIN, Norbert (2006) "Pronouns in a Minimalist Setting",
University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics,
14, 47-80.
HUANG, Yan (2000) Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Study, Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
İNCE,
Ataka
n (2007) "Direct complement clauses as Object Control Structures in Turkish", (Ed.) Erin Bainbridge & Brian Agbayani, Proceedings of the thirty-fourth Western Conference On Linguistics, Los Angeles, 208-221.
KAYNE, Richard (2002) "Pronouns and their Antecedents", (Ed.)
Samuel D. Epstein & T. D. Seely, Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell
Publishing, Oxford, 133-166.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (1984) Case Marking, Agreement and Empty Categories in Turkish, Harvard University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (1997) Turkish, Routledge, London.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (2004) "Agr in Turkish as an Expression of Categorial Features", (Ed.) Meltem Kelepir and Balkız Öztürk, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 52, Proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics II, The MIT Press, Cambridge and Mass.
KORNFILT, Jaklin (2007) "Verbal and Nominalized Finite Clauses in Turkish", (Ed.) I. Nikoloeva, Finiteness: Theoretical and
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature
and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 5/4 Fall 2010
562 Hasan Mesut MERAL
Empirical Foundations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 305-332.
KURAL, Murat (1992) "V-to-I-to-C in Turkish", (Ed.) F. Beghelli
and Murat Kural, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics,
1-37.
MERAL, Hasan Mesut (2005) "On Some ECM Constructions in Turkish", Ms. Boğaziçi University.
MERAL, Hasan Mesut (2010) Resumption, A'- Dependencies and Implications on Clausal Architecture, Boğaziçi University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
ODED, Ilknur (2006) Control in Turkish, Boğaziçi University, M.A.
Thesis.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru
(1983
) Reflexivization in Turkish: A Syntactic, Semantic and Discourse Analysis, University of Michigan, Ph.D. Dissertation.
ÖZSOY, A. Sumru
(1984
) "On the Syntactic Properties of Empty Categories", (Ed.) Ayhan Aksu-Koç, and Eser, Erguvanlı-Taylan, Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference, Boğaziçi Univeristy Press, Istanbul, 101 -111.
ÖZSOY,
A
. Sumru (2001) "On 'Small' Clauses, other 'Bare' Verbal Complements and Feature Checking in Turkish", (Ed.) Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan, The Verb in Turkish, John Benjamins Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 213-237.
ÖZSOY,
A
. Sumru (to appear) "Birbirleri as an (un)-anaphor", (Ed.)
Eva Agnes Csato, Birsel Karakoç and Astrid Menz),
Turcologica, The Uppsala Meeting: The Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Harrassowitz Publishing House, Wiesbaden.
ÖZTÜRK, Balkız
(2005
) Case, Referentiality and Phrase Structure, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
REULAND, Eric (2001) "Primitives of Binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 439-492.
REULAND, Eric (2005) "Binding Conditions: How are they Derived?" (Ed.) Stefan Müller, Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference. University of Lisbon.
SAFIR, Ken (2004) The Syntax of Anaphora, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature
and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 5/4 Fall 2010
Some Notes On Turkish. 563 SAFIR, Ken (2008) "Coconstrual and Narrow Syntax", Syntax, 11/3,
330-355.
Tarama Sözlüğü, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara 1996.
ZIDANI-EROGLU, Leyla
(1997
) "Exceptionally Case-Marked NPs as Matrix Objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 28/2, 219-230.
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature
and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 5/

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com