You are here

Home » Content

“Self-efficacy scale for teachers”-Preliminary study-

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
The purpose of this study is to introduce “Self-efficacy scale for teachers” into scientific field in order to evaluate teachers’ opinions on their self-efficacy. This study which is conducted to develop “Self-efficacy scale for teachers” aims at making clear the contribution of teacher behaviour to psychological measuring as well as providing support for psychometric studies which have recently become popular. In order to determine the self-efficacy of teachers, 3 experts who have a good command on the field and work in education sector put forward 20 items after having discussed on them and later they reduced them to 13 items. Then, 5 point likert scale comprising of 13 items was prepared. 3 experts who have a good command on the field removed 5 items of the scale which are not suitable for self-efficacy, which cannot define self-efficacy and whose scale set up could not be formed properly. Finally, 8 items remained in the scale, which is also the final state of it. Upon reducing the scale to 8 items, 50 teachers were applied the 8-item scale. It was investigated that whether the questions are comprehensible and whether there are general problems regarding the questions. Second application started after proving the comprehensibility of the 8 items. 670 teachers from each branch were applied the scale in the second application. 170 teachers were removed from the study as they lacked several questions in the scale. Statistical analyses were carried out on the forms filled out by 500 teachers from each branch. Descriptive Statistics, Pearson’s Correlation Technique, Principal Components Factor Analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha were used for the analyses of the statistics. According to the findings obtained from the analyses, it was found out that there were no inoperative items and all 8 items could be utilized. It was determined that Cronbach’s Alpha, which is an internal consistency coefficient, was .87 and the scale had high reliability coefficient. The scale was under only one factor. Results showed that “Self-efficacy scale for teachers” could be more beneficial when it is applied on a broader group of teachers.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-self-efficacy-scale-teachers-preliminary-study.pdf
  • 2
163
169
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement, remedial and special education. Remedial ve Special Education, 16(4), 247.
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (5), 28-32.
Aslan, O., Uluçınar Sağır, Ş. (2008). Determining the scientific attitudes and self-efficacy levels of candidate science and technology teachers and determining the factors which have impacts on it, 8th International Educational Technology Conference (IETC-2008).
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Petitta, L., ve Rubinacci, A. (2006). Teachers', school staff's and parents' efficacy beliefs as determinants of attitude toward school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 15−31.
Cömert, M. Demirtaş, H. Özer, N. Üstüner, M. (2009). Turkish high school students’ attitudes toward addictive subattitudes: association with perceived parental attitudes. Journal of Drug Education, 39(1), 59-71.
Çakiroglu, J., Özkan, O. Tekkaya, C. (2002). Turkish pre-service science teachers’understanding of science and their confidence in teaching it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 57-68. Gerçek, C. P. Köseoğlu, H. Soran and M. Yılmaz, (2005). Examining the approaches of candidate teachers regarding their computer use in terms of several variables. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Magazine, 30, 130-139, 10s. Leader, Y. 2003. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., ve Sawyer, L.B.E. (2004). Primary Grade Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Attitudestoward Teaching, and Discipline and Teaching Priorities in Relation to the Responsive Classroom Approach. Elementary School Journal, 104 (4), 321-341.
Schunk, D. H. (1991) .Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames ve R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 13-44). San Diego: Academic.Taşdemir, A. 2007. The Impact on Education and Learning Strategies. 4(1). 99- 121.
Ozdemir, S. (2008). Secure Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks via Homomorphic Encryption. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 365(373).
Yılmaz, D. Demirtaş, H. Özer N. Üstüner M. (2007). “Education and Manipulation”, Magazine of Science and Wisdom, 99, 12-19.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, ve M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com