. Abate l'F, Bcrtachini SM, Polack MA. Macchi Rl,. Adhesion of a compomer lo dental Structures. O ilini ess ence iril. 1997; 28(8); 509-12
2.
Alpa7. R. Kompomer (re/.ııı modifiye cam ionomer) simanlar; İzmir Dişhekimügi Odası Dergisi: 1996;3:24-36.
3. Bracket WW, Gunnin I Dt üılpatrick RO, Browning WD. Microleacagc of Class V resin modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations
4. Brandal JL, Nichols JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodonucallv treated anterior teeth. I. Proslhel denl i 987; 58:161-165
5. Bohsali K, Pcrtot WJ, Hosseini B, Camps I. Sealing ability of super hHA and Dyract as root-end fillings:a studv invitro; International Bndodnnlic Journal 1998;31:338-342
6. Chadwick RG, Woolford MJ. A eomporison of
conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements. J Dent 1993; 21(2) I I 1-6
7. Chersoni Sv Loren/J R, Fcrricri P, Prati CL. Labaratory Evaluation of compomers in classV restorations. Am J Denl 1997; 10(3): 147-51
8. Croll TP. Glass ionoracrs for infants, children and adolescents. J Am Dent Assoc 1990, 120.65-68
9.
Demirc
i M, Üçok M, Küçükkeleş N, Soydan N. Pulp reaction to it Iri-cure resın-modifıcd glas ionomer Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 1998; 85(6): 712-19
10. Denehy GB, Vargas M, Class V restorations utilizing a new compomer material : a case presentation Practpcriodondtics Acstli Dent 1996; 8 : 269-75
5 8
Atatürk Üniv Dis Hek.Fak.Derg. Cift:10, Sayı:!, Sayfa:55-59,2000
Y I L D I Z , BAYINDIR
11. Dunne SM, GooLnık JS, Miliar BJ, Scddorı RP. Caries inhibition by a resin- modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro i Dent 1996 24( 1-2): 91-4
12. Ernest CP, Wcnzl N, Slender E, WillcrshaLisen B. Retentive strengths of caxi gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer or resin cement J Proxthei Dent 1998: 79(4): 472-6
13. Ferrari M, V1CH A, Manned F. Sealing ability of two" Compomers" applied wkh and without phosphoric acid treatment for class 5 restorations invivo; The Journal of Prosthod dentistry: 1998; 79-2; 131-135
14. Forsten L. Resin modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odonto Scan 1995 Aug; 53(4): 222-5
İ5,
Frii
x UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Marginal adaptation resin-bonded class ionomers in denlin cavities. Am J Dent 1996; 9(6): 253-S
16. Gareia-Godoy F, Hasuya Y. Bonding mechanism of compoglass to dentin in primary teeth; J Clin I'ediatr Dent; 1988; 22(3): 217-20
17. Hse KMY, Leon SK, Vei SHY. Resin monomer restorative materials for children: A rcwiev, The Austrian Dental Journal 1996;44:1-11
18. Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, Mc Cabe JF. The use of a reinforced glass mosen ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars a clinical trials. British Denial Journal. 1995; 179:175-179
19. Marouf N. Sidhn SK. A study _ on the radioopacity of different shades of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Opcr Dent L998; 23(1): 10-4
20. Me Lean JW, Class iononmer cements. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 293-300
21. McLean JW. Clinical application of glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1992; 17: Suppl 5; 184-190.
22. Millar BJ. Abiden F. Nicholson JW. mvitro caries inhibition by poliacid modifivc composite resins (Compomer) J Dent 1998 ; 26(2): 133-6: 28
23. Mount GJ. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cement in the clinical environment. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 141-48
24. Musa A, Pearson GJ, Belbier M, In vitro investigation of fluoride ion release from four resin-modified glass polialkenoate ccmcnLs. Biomatcrials 1996; 17(10); 1019-23
25. Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal radicular dowel and core technique for endodonlically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980: 43: 5 3 ]"-5l4
26. Owens BM, Maker TK, Brown E)M, Microlcakage of restorations with a beveled gingiva margin Quintessence International 1998; 29(6): 356-61
27. Papathanasiou AD, Cur™n MEJ, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate ol restorations in primary moiars Pcdialr Dent 1994; 16: 282-88
28. Salama FS. Hffect of laser pretreatcd enamel and dentin of primary teeth on mieroleakage of different restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998 ;3: 24-36
29. Seven N.
Ark
a grup dişlerde kııllarulan üç dolgu maddesinin mikrosızmlı, su emme ve çözünürlük özelliklerinin karşılaşlırtlması: Bölüm 2. Oral Der.1988; 5:55-57
30. Sidhu SK.Watson TF. Resin-mndıfıed glass ionomers materials. Journal of Dentistry 1995;8:59-67
3 I. Swift EJ, Van WF. restoration of primary molars using a new kompomer material. Practice Penodondics Aeslhet Dent I995;7 :25-3ü
32. Tolcdano M, Osorio H, Odorio R, Gareiagodoy F. Mieroleakage of elass V resin modifiye glas ionomer and compomer restorations 1999; 81-25; 610-614
33. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhcd D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition Svvced E)ent J 1998 ; 22(4): 149-55
34.
Zaimoğk
ı A, Can G. Ersoy F, Aksu L, Diş Hekimliğinde maddeler bilgisi. Ankara; Ankara Üniversitesi Basım Evi. 1993: 334-341
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com