You are here

Hydropower Generation and River Water Pollution in India

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Power generation (including energy generated from renewable sources) impacts local ecosystems and communities. There is a tendency to turn a blind eye to these impacts and treat all renewable technologies as unconditionally good because they do not emit greenhouse gases. Renewable power must be sited, designed, and operated in a manner that also protects the local ecosystem. Hydropower dam operations are responsible for the extinction and near-extinction of a number of species, and are a major contributor to the significant loss of aquatic biodiversity. Hydropower dams have flooded forests (causing the irretrievable loss of carbon sinks), damaged entire fisheries, and diminished recreational opportunities, and decimated the local – mostly rural – economies that depend on those resources. Hydropower dams are a significant source of water pollution. Scientists and legal scholars have long acknowledged that hydropower dams cause pollution by altering the temperature and chemical makeup of water that is impounded behind and released through dams, harming the biological integrity of river ecosystems. The cumulative impacts of multiple hydropower dams are often much greater than the simple sum of their direct impacts. Even a very small single dam can entrain fish, block fish passage and displace wildlife. A series of dams can severely impact an entire watershed, even if each of the individual dams seems relatively low impact when considered in isolation. The extent of this damage can be much greater when combined with a whole host of other threats to rivers: poor water quality, a growing demand for scarce water, encroaching urbanization, and poor land-management decisions. We must encourage the development of low emissions energy sources, but this development must be protective of our natural environment.
134
139

REFERENCES

References: 

Agarwal, T., Khillore, P. and Sridhar, V. (2006). PAHs contamination in Bane Sediment of the Yamuna River, Delhi. J. Environ. Monit. Assess.123(1-3), 151-166.
Arya, S.C., Rao, K.S. and Shrivastava, S. (2001).Biodiversity and Fishery Potential of Narmada
Basin Western Zone (M.P., India) with Special Reference to Fish Conservation, Environment
benthic macro invertebrates, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1-9.
Bhatt R.P., Khanal S.N., Maskey R.(2011).Water Quality impacts of Hydropower Project operation, International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 1 (1), 2231-4490.
Chapman D. (1992). Water Quality Assessment; A guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. University Press, Cambridge, 585.
Costanza, R., dArge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature,(387), 253–260.
GoN(1993).National Environmental Assessment Guidelines. Nepal Gazette (Rajpatra), 43(5).
IJART- Vol-1, Issue-2, December, 2016 Available online at http://www.ijart.info/
IMPACT FACTOR- 1.625
139
Agrawal and Sikarwar, 2016
@IJART-2016, All Rights Reserved
Hassan, S.S., Sinha, R.K., Ahsan, S.N. and Hassan, N. (1998a).Impact of Fishing Operations and Hydrobiological Factors on Recent Fish Catch in Ganga near Patna, India. In: Inland Fish. Soc. 30(1), 1-12.
Hassan, S.S., Sinha, R.K., Hassan, N. and Ahsan, I. (1998b). The Current Seasonal Variation in Catch Diversity and Composition of Fish Communities Vis-a-vis Various Factors in the Ganges at Patna (India) and Strategies for Sustainable Development. Freshwater Biol. 10 (3 – 4), 141 –157.
Hatcher, P.G., and McGillivary, P. A. (1979). Sewage contamination in the New York Bight. Coprostanol as an indicator. Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 1225-1229.
Jha, B.R., Waidbacher H., Sharma, S., and Straif, M. (2007) Fish base study of the impacts of dams in different rivers of Nepal and its seasonal variations. Ultra Science 19 (1), 27-44.
Moss, B. (1998) Ecology of Fresh Waters Man and Medium, Past to Future. 3rd Edition. Blackwell Publishing. 118 – 122.
Naidu, B.S.K. (1993) Environmental Aspects of Chamera Hydroelectric Project (540 MW) in
Himachal Pradesh. Environmental Impacts of Water Resources Development, National Round Table Discussion.(eds.) Goel, R.S. June 4 –5, 1993., Tata McGraw – Hill Publishing Company Limited.
Ogbeibu, A. E., Oribhabor, B. J. (2002) Ecological impact of river impoundments using benthic
macro-invertebrates as indicators. Journal of Water Research 36, 2427–2436.
Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V. H. (1993) Introduction to Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic
Macroinvertebrates; Rosenberg, D.M. and Resh, V. H. (editors); Freshwater biomonitoring and
benthic macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1-9.
Shrestha S. & Kazama F.(2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22,464–475.
Simeonov, V., Stratis, J. A., Samara, C., Zachariadis, G., Voutsa, D., Anthemidis, A., et al. (2003). Assessment of the surface water quality in Northern Greece. Water Research, 37, 4119–4124.
Singh, A., Ghosh, S. and Sharma, P. (2007). Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna. An interactive fuzzy multi. objective approach. J. Water Res. Manag., 21(2), 515-532.
Singh, K. P., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India) – A case study, Water Research, 38, 3980–3992
Vega, M., Pardo, R., Barrado, E., & Deban, L. (1998). Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the Quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Research, 32, 3581–3592.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com