Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DENTİN BONDİNGLİ VE BONDİNGSİZ UYGULANMIŞ BİR KOMPOZİT REÇİNENİN NEDEN OLDUĞU MİKROSIZINTI VE PULPA YANITI

MICROLEAKAGE AND PULP RESPONSE OF A COMPOSITE RESIN APPLIED WITH AND WITHOUT DENTIN BONDING AGENT

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
A restoration with a material which has good bonding capabilities will minimize gap formation and microleakage between Üıe tooth filing and thereby reduce the risk of recurrent caries and pulp injury. In this study, thepulpal responses to a composite material (Pi50, 3M) applied with and without a dentin bonding agent (Scotchbond-2, 3M) was investigated in human teeth. At the end of 6th. week, the teeth were extracted and evaluated under a light microscope following histopathological processing. The results indicated that the pulpal responses to two groups were similar. The statistical evaluation also showed that the difference between two eroubs was not significant (P>0.05) Tilere was a destruction in odontoblast laver combined with hvberemic blood vessels Bacterial Penetration was observed on Üıe floor and walls of cavities.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Diş dokularına iyi bağlanma Özellikleri olan bir materyal ile dolgu yapıldığında diş ile restorasyon arasında oluşan aralık ve mikrosizmü azalacak böylece de çürük tekrarı ve puipa hasan riski azalabilecektir. Bu çalışmada, insan dişlerine bonding ajan (Scotc-hbond-2, 3M) ile ve bonding ajansız uygulanmış bir kompozit materyalin (P-50, 3M) pulpada oluşturduğu yanıt araştırıldı. Dişler 6. hafta sonunda çekildi ve his-topatolojik işlemleri takiben bir ışık mikroskobu altında incelendi. Sonuçlar her iki gruba ait pıüpa yanıtlarının benzer olduğunu gösterdi. İstatistiksel İncelemede de her iki grup arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (P>0.05;. Pulpa reaksiyonları genellikle hafifti. Hipe-remik kan damarları ile odontoblast tabakasında hara-biyet en önemli bulgulardır. Kavitenin taban ve duvarlarında ise bakteri penetrasyonu gözlendi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dentin-bondingli-bondingsiz-uygulanmis-bir-kompozit-recinenin-neden-oldugu-mikrosizinti-pulpa-yaniti.pdf
  • 1
21
26
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Al-Davood A, Wennberg A. Biocompatibility of elentin bonding agents. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993: 9:1-7.
2.
Aras Ş, Mısırlıgil A. Çctiner S. Kenar sızıntısının engellenmesinde kullanılan çeşitli ajanların antibakteriyel etkinliklerinin araştırılman. A Ü Diş Hek Fak Derg 1989: 16 (i); 93-6.
3. Brannström M. Nyborg H. The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate cement and composite resin materials. Swed DentJ 1971: 64:149-55.
4. Brannström M. Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of concise enamel bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities../ Dent Res 1978: 57 (1): 3-10.
5. Ftıks AB, Funnel B, Celeaton - Jones P. Pulp response
to a composite resin inserted in deep cavities with and without a surface seal.JProslhet Dent 1990: 63: 129-34.
6. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence hit 1987: 18(9): 633-41.
7. Duke, ES, Lindemudi, J. Polymeric adhesion to dentin: Contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990; 3: 264-70.
8. Grieve AR, Alani A, Saunders WP. The ef fects on the dental pulp of a composite resin and two dentine bonding agents and associated bacterid microleakage. hit Endod J 1991: 2*108-18.
9. Heys RJ, Heys DR, Fitzgerald M. Histological evaluation of microfilled and conventional composite resin on monkey dental pulps, hit Endod/1985: 18: 260-6.
26
Tannverdi F Sazak H
Karakaya Ş
10. Homed - Bindslev P. Monkey pnlp reactions to cavities treated with gluma dentin bond and restored with a mic-rofilled composite. ScandJ Dent Res 1987: 95: 347-55.
11. Langeland K, Deng H, Pascon EA. Bicompatibility of dentin adhcsives./Dent Res 1986: 65 (special issue): 251, abstract no 733.
12. Qyist V. Resin restorations: leakage, bacteria, pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993: 9: 127-52.
13. Stanley HR. Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers. Adv Dent Res 1992: 6: 55-64.
14. Tannverdi F, Günday M, Ataiay T. Pulp responses to three dentine bonding agents in dogs teeth. J Marmara
Univ Dent Fak 1993: 1 (4): 321-6.
15. Von Leeuwen MJ, Dagon IL, HeeleyJ. A histological studyof two visible light cured esters of BIS-GMA Ji>en(ftef 1985: 64 {special issuej: 222, abstract no 425.
16. Vojinovic O, Nyborg H, Brannström M. Acid treatment of cavities under resin Fillings: Bacterid growth in dentinal tubules and pulpal reactions./DentRei 1973: 52 (6): 1189-93.
17. Van Meerbeek, B, Braem, M, Labrechts, P, Vanher-ie, G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. /ProsthetDent 1993: (70):308-14.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com