Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

CAM İYONÖMER SİMANLARININ PULPAYA ETKİLERİ

PULPAL EFFECTS OF GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study the effects of Chem-Fil II, Chelon-Fil and Chelon- silver glass ianomer cements on the pulp in Class V camties opened in canine incisors were studied. Cavities in the control group were filled with zinc oxide/eugenol (Kalzinol). Teeth were examined at 7, 30 and 90 days. In the 7th day Chem-Fil group samples mild inflammatory reaction was seen wheras other glass ianomer cements Showed no inflammatory reaction nor necrosis in the 7th 30th 90th day findings. All glass ionomer cements produced morepulpal reaction that by the control
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, köpek kesici dişlerinde açılan Class V kavitelerinde Chem-Fil II, Chem-Fİl ve Chelon-Silver cam iyonomer sunanlarının pulpaya etkileri encelenmiştir. Kontrol grubundaki kaviteler çinkooksit öienol (Kalzinol) ile doldurulmuştur. Dişler 7, 30, 90 günlük periodlarda incelenmiştir. 7. gün Chem Fil gurubu örneklerinde hafif derecede iltihap hücrelerine rastlanırken diğer bütün cam iyonomer simanlannm 7„ 30. ve 90. gün bulgularında iltihap hücresi ve neknoz görülmemiştir. Bütün cam iyonomer siınanlar. kontrol grubundan daha fazla pulpa reaksiyonu oluşturmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cam-iyonomer-simanlarinin-pulpaya-etkileri.pdf
  • 1
59
62
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Beer R, Gangler P, Wutzler P, Krchan F. Comparative biological testing of KetacBond giass ionomer cement. Dtsch Zahnar Ztl Z 1990: 45: 202-8.
2. Browne RM, Plant CG, Tobias RS. Quantification of the histological features of pulpal damage. Int EndodJ 1980: 13: 104-11.
3. Browne RM, Tobias RS, Crombie IK, Plant CG. Bacterial microleakage and pulpa! inflammation in experimental cavities. Int EndodJ1983: 16:147-55.
4. Cooper IR. The response of the human dental pulp to a glass ionomer cements, hit Endod J1980; 13: 7&-88.
5. Dahi BL, Tronstad L. Biological tests of an experimental glass ionomer (silicopolyacrylate) cement. J Oral Rehabil 1976: 3: 19-24.
6. Deux D, Bonin P, Boivin R, Poulard J. Experimental study of the effect of a photopholymerizabie glass ionomer cavity liner on pulp pressure and temperature. Rev Fr Endod 1990: 9: 25-30.
7. Fclton DA, Cox CF, Odom M, Kanoy BE. Pulpal response to chemically cured and experimental light-cured glass ionomer cavity liners. J ProsOiet Dent 1991: 65:704-12.
8. Heys RJ, Heys DR, Cox CF, Avery JK The effect of bacteria on the pulpal response of various restorative materials. /Dent Res 1979: 58: 161 (Abstr. 270).
9. Kawahara H, Imanishi Y, Oshima H. Biological evaluation
on glass ionomer cemcnt./Z)enf Res 1979: 58: 1080¬6.
10. Klöızcr WT, Pulp reactions to a glass-ionomcr ce¬ment, J Dent Res 1975: 54: 678 (Abstr. 75).
11. Pameijcr CH. Segal E, Richardson }. Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement in primates. JProsthet Dent 1981: 46: 36-40.
12. Patcrson RC, Watts A. Toxicity to the pulp of a glass-İonomer cement. Br Dent J 1987:162: 110-2.
13. Plant CG, Browne RM, Knibbs PJ, Britton AS, Sora-han T. Pulpal effects of glass-ionomcr cements. Int EndodJ 1984: /7.-Öİ-9.
14. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant CG, Ingram DV. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1978: 144: 345-50.
15. Tobias RS, Plant CG, Browne RM. A comparative pulpal study of the irritant effects of silicate cements. Br DentJL98l: 150: 119-24.
16. Tyas MJ, Browne RM. Biological testing of dental restorative materials. / Oral Rehabil 1977: 4: 275-90.
17. Üçok. M. Biological evaluation ol"a glass ionomer cements. Int Endod J1986: 19:285-97.
18. Wilson AD, Kent lie. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J1972: 132:133-5.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com