Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

HİBRİD ÎYONOMER MATERYATXERIN POLİMERİZASYON BÜZÜLMESİ VE MİKROSIZINTISI

POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE AND MICRO LEAKAGE OF HYBRID IONOMER MATERIALS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Hybrid ionomers display faster shrink on setting than traditional glass ionomer cements because ol" polymer content ol" hybrid ionomers; setting shrinkage decrease, by the increase of powder/liquid ratio. Hybrid ionomers have some advantages over traditional glass ionomer cements about microleakage being prevented, as the adequately of wetting the tooth surface or adhere to dentin immediately by application light and lower water content than glass ionomer cements. On the other hand, the physical and chemical properties of hybrid ionomers are. different for each material ol" this group, and this results from the variation of their chemical structures.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Hibrid iyonomerler polimer içerikleri nedeniyle geleneksel cam iyonomer simanlanna omnia, daha hızlı bir sertleşme büzülmesi sergilemekte, toz/likit ninninin yükseltilmesiyle polimerizasyun büzülmesi azalmakladır Dis yüzeylerini iyi ıslatması, geleneksel cam Eyonomer s iman] arına oranla düşük su oranı vc ışık uygulaması sonucu hemen dentine yapışması gibi nitelikler, mikrosı-zintmın engellenmesi açısından hibrid iyımomcrlerin geleneksel cam iyonomer limanlarına aranla sahip olduğu avantajlardır. Diğer taraftan hibrid iyonomer materyallerin fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri bu gruptaki bir maddeden diğer maddeye farklılık göstermekte, bu da kimyasal yapılarındaki değişiklikten kaynaklanmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-hibrid-iyonomer-materyatxerin-polimerizasyon-buzulmesi-mikrosizintisi.pdf
  • 1
60-63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Altin T. Buchalla W, Kiclbassa AM, Hehvig E. Curing shrinkage and volumelrie changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995; I ! (6): 359-62
2. Brackclt WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO> Browning WD. Mieroleakage of Class V compomcr and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. J Proslhel Dent 1998; 790): 261-3¬3. Bracken WW, Gunnin TD, Johnson WW, Conkin
JE. Microleakage of light-cured glass4onoiner restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(8): 583-5¬4. Burgess J, Norling B, Summit. J. Resin ionomer restorative materials.: the new generation, J Esthct Dent 1994; 6(5): 207-15.
5. Code; KL, Barkmeier WW, Dentinal shear bond strength, microleakage and gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases. Quintessence Int 1991; 22(6): 467-74.
6. Crim OA. Marginal leakage of visible-light cured glass ionomer restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69(6): 561-3.
7. Kwoldscn NO, Moore BK, Winkler MM. Laboratory testing of type II light-cured glass ionomers as pil/fissurc sealants. J Dent Res 1994: 73(Special Issue): IS4(Abslr. No: 659).
8. Ferrari M, Davidson Cl.. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomcr and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations. Opcr Dent 1996; 21(2): 69-72.
9. Fried! K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid/composite- sandwich restorations. Opcr Dent 1997; 22(1): 21-9.
10. Grande RHM. Ballester RY, Singer JM, Santos JFF. Microleakage of a universal adhesive used as a fissure sealant. Am J Dent 1998; 11(3): 109-13.
11. Hinoura K, Onose H, Matsuzaki M, Kııroda T, Moore BK, Volumetric shrinkage of light cured glass iunomer bases. J Dent Res 1992; 71 (Special Issue): 632 (Abslr. No: 938).
12 Irie M, Nakai H. Marginal scalability of resin modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hvgroscopic expansion and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1996; 15(2): 193-200.
13. Irie M, Kakaı M, Hirota K. Marginal gap of light-activated glass- ionomers: effect of hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1992; 71(Spicial Issue); 633 (Abstr. No:941).
14. Johnson LM, Duke ES, Camm J, Hcrmesch CB, Buikema DJ. Examination of a resin-modi lied glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(12): 879 83.
62
Atatürk Üniv.Dis Hek.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt; 10, Sayırl, Sayfa:60-63,2000
DEMİRCİ, ÜÇOK
15. Martin FE, O'Rotırke M. Marginal seal tooth coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Ausl Dent J 1993; 38(2): IÜ2-7.
16. Optam NJM, Roctcrs JIM, Btirgcrsdijk RCW. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restoralions. Am J Dent 199S; 1 1(4): 160-4.
17. Puckett AD, Fitchie JG, Dennett B,Hembrec JH. Microleakage and thermal properties of hybrid ionomer restoratives. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(8): 377-81.
18. Quinn K An in-vitro investigation into the sealing ability of two fourth generation dentine bonding agents and two resin modified glass polyalkenoatc restoratives. Eur J Fro&thodont Res Dent 1995; 3(3):
i
19-25.
19. Sidhu SK. Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. J Prosthel Dent 1992; 68(6): 891-4.
20. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ, In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. OperDcnt 1992; 17(1 J; 7-12.
21. Sidhu'SK, Watson TF. Fluid permeability and otherinterfacial characteristics of light cured-glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1994; 73 (Special Issue): 183 (Abstr.No:651).
22. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Rcsin-modilied glass ionomer materials. A status report, for the American Journal of Dentistry- Am J Dent 1995: 8(1): 59-67.
23. Sidlw SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. The effect of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modificd glass-ionomer restorations, J Dent Res 1997; 76(S): 1495 1501.
24. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121(6): 706-10.'
25. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorlo R, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomcr restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81(5): 610-£5,
26. Tolidis K, Nohccourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polimerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater 1998; 14(6): 417-23.
27. Watson TF. A confoeal microscopical study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a llght-ctircd glass ionomer to tooth tissue. J Dent Res 1990; 69(8): 1531-8.
28. Watson T. Sidhu S, Griffiths B.fonomer.s vs. composites at the tooth interface. In: Hunt PR, Hd. Glass Ionomers: The next generation. Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Pennsylvania: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994: 123-130.
29. Yap ALT, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal seaiing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Orel Rehabil 1998: 25(9): 666-71.
3Ü.
Ya
p AUJ, Lim CC, Nco JCL. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(11): 817-20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com