Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÖN ÖRGÜTLEYİCİLERİN OKUDUĞUNU ANLAMA ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

THE EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON READING COMPREHENSION

Journal Name:

  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this research is to study the effects of advance organizers on English reading comprehension and the relationship with gender. The research was conducted on 62 (41 females, 21 males) ninth grade students, in English reading comprehension course. Pretest-posttest experimental design with control group was used for the research. Advance organizers were presented to the experiment group, whereas the control group received no advance organizers. The data of the research were gathered with Reading Comprehension Test. The results of the study indicate that, there was no statistically significant difference between reading comprehension achievement of students in the experiment and control groups. There was no statistically significant difference between reading comprehension achievement of the male and female students both in the experiment and control groups.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, ön örgütleyicilerin öğrencilerin İngilizce okuduğunu anlama başarıları üzerindeki etkilerini ve bu etkilerin cinsiyetle ilişkilerini incelemektir. Araştırma 62 (41 kız, 21 erkek) 9. sınıf öğrencileri üzerinde, İngilizce Okuduğunu Anlama dersinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada kontrol gruplu öntest-sontest deneysel araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Deney Grubuna ön örgütleyiciler verilmiş, Kontrol Grubuna ise verilmemiştir. Araştırmanın verileri, Çoktan Seçmeli İngilizce Okuduğunu Anlama Başarı Testi ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, Deney ve Kontrol Gruplarındaki öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama başarıları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamış, Deney ve Kontrol Gruplarındaki kız ve erkek öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama başarıları arasında bir farklılığın olmadığı saptanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon uvt_71675.pdf
  • 1
50-62
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adams, M. J. ve Collins, A. (1997). A schemata-theoretic view of reading. Massachusetts:Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brozo, W. G. ve Simpson, M. L. (1995). Readers, teachers, learners. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Carrell. D. P. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal, 68 (4). S. 332-341.
Carrell, D. L.ve Eisterhold, J. C. (1988). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy.Interactive approaches to second language reading (Ed. P. L. Carrell, J. Devine,
D.E. Eskey).
Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press. S. 73-90.
Chastain, K.
(1988)
. Developing second-language skills. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
Coleman, L. F. (1991). The effects of a pictorial advance organizer on the comprehension of authentic texts by L2 readers of French. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. South Carolina University, America.
Croyle, L. J. (1980). An examination of three types of expository organizers in the area of social studies at the middle school level. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
PittsburghUniversity.
Dills, C. R. (1995). Individual subject response patterns to textual advance
organizers.Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Syracuse University.
Ön Örgütleyicilerin Okuduğunu anlama ... /OMÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, (2006) 50-62
Elkin, M. L.
(1980)
. Graphic organizers and reading performance. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Yeshiva University.
Erskine, B. J.
(1991)
. Text processing and recall of text in university students: An investigation of the effects of advance organizers. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. York University, Canada.
Estes, T. H. (1971). The effect of advance organizers upon meaningful reception learning and retention of social studies content. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 056848.
Grabe, W. ve Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Pearson Education.
Groller, K. L., Kender, J. P. ve Honeyman, D. S. (1991). Does instruction on metecognitive strategies help students use advance organizers? Journal of Reading, 34 (6). S. 470- 475.
Hall, C. K. (1977). The effects of graphic advance organizers and schematic cognitive mapping organizers upon the comprehensiom ninth grade students. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. The State University of New Jersey.
Kater, C. D. (1990). Advance organizer effect on short-term learning. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Missouri, Columbia.
Kloster, A. M. ve Winne, P. H. (1989). The effects of different types of organizers on students'learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (1). S. 9-15.
Lasky, B. A. (1986). Advance organizers as an instructional strategy for bilingual learning disabled students. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Arizona University.
Livingston, M. E. E. (1984). The effects of advance organizer and direct instruction pre-instructional passages on learning and retention for eighth-grade students. New YorkUniversity.
Marshall, S. G. (1994). Interactive effects between advance organizers and preferred
learning styles. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. The University of Texas, Austin. McWhorter, K. T. (1998). Academic reading. New York: Longman.
Morganett, L. L. (1980). The effects of testing and level of knowledege of an advance organizer on learning and retention of social studies content. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Indiana University.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Great Britain: Redwood Books.
Petersen, C., Glover, J. A. ve Ronning, R. R. (1980). An examination of three prose learning strategies on reading comprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 102. S. 39-52.
Rodgers, C. A. (1981). Using a comparative advance organizer: The effect of identifiedrelationships on students' expectancy for success. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Syracuse University.
Senemoğlu, N. (2003). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Smith, B. D. (1993). Bridging the gap, college reading. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Snowman, J. ve Biehler, R. (2003). Psychology applied to teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Story, C. M. (1998). What instructional designers need to know about advance organizers. International Journal of instructional Media, 25 (3). S. 253-262.
Thompson, D. N. (1997). Practise effects of advance organization with older adult subjects. Educational Gerontology. 23 (3).
Tyler, S. W. (1983). Specifying the nature of reading ability differeneces and advance organizer effects. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 289035.
Underhill, P. A. (2001). A test of the effect of advance organizers and reading ability on seventh-grade science achievement. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of South Carolina.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com