Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FtBERLE GÜÇLENDtRtLMtŞ KOMPOZtT VE SERAMtKLE HAZIRLANAN SABtT RESTORASYONLARIN KIRILMA DtRENÇLERtNtN DEĞERLENDtRtLMESt

DETERMINATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF FIXED RESTORATIONS PREPARED WITH FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: Fiber-reinforced composite resins and lithium-disilicate glass ceramics may be used to restore the lost tissues of teeth. Inlay-retained fixed partial prostheses are conservative restorations because of less preparation of teeth and protection of periodontal health. Objective: To compare the fracture resistance of resin-bonded inlay-retained fixed partial prostheses prepared with resin- impregnated fiber-reinforced composite, bar fiber-reinforced composite and lithium-disilicate glass ceramic. Material and Method: A light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite (^lite/Bisco/USA) with resin-impregnated fiber (Everstick CB/StickTech/Finland) (Groupl) and bar fiber (Tescera Rod/Bisco/USA) (Group2), and IPS Empress-II glass-ceramic (Ivoclar-Vivadent/Liechtenstein) (Group3) (n=7) were used in the study. Class II cavities were prepared on 2nd premolar (occlusodistal) and 2nd molar (occlusomesial). Teeth were placed with 10mm space. They were duplicated with sensitive impression material (Optosil-Xantopren/Heraeus-Kulzer/Germany). Mold was prepared with Ni-Cr alloy. Inlay-retained fixed partial prostheses were prepared on cast dies. Specimens were tested with Universal test machine (Lloyd-LRX-Universal/Fareham/England, 1.0mm/min, 250 kgf load cell) . One-Way-ANOVA and Duncan Multiple Comparison Test were used for statistical analyses (p<0,05). Results: Difference was not found between Group2 (359,504±43,940N) and Group3 (304,286±100,667N, p>0.05). The fracture resistance values of Groupl (463,914±82,738N) were statistically higher than Group2 (359,504±43,940N) and Group3 (304,286±100,667N) (p<0.05). Cohesive fractures were commonly observed. Conclusion: All restorations with light-polymerized composite reinforced with resin-impregnated fiber and bar fiber, and lithium dislicate-glass-ceramic were durable to chewing forces. It was thougth that, they can be safely used to restore the loss of teeth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Giriş: Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit rezinler ve lityum disilikatla güçlendirilmiş cam seramik materyaller, madde kaybına uğramış dişlerin restorasyonlarında sıklıkla kullanılmaktadırlar. İnley destekli sabit parsiyel restorasyonlar, dişlerde preparasyon miktarının az tutulabildiği ve dişlerin ve periodontal sağlığın daha fazla korunabildiği konservatif restorasyonlardır. Amaç: Rezin emdirilmiş fiber ve bar şeklinde fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit ve lityum disilikatla güçlendirilmiş cam seramik materyallerle hazırlanan ve rezinle yapıştırılan inley destekli sabit parsiyel restorasyonların basma kırılma dirençlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada; rezin emdirilmiş fiber (Everstick CB/StickTech/Finland) (Grup1) ve bar şeklinde fiberle (Tescera Rod/Bisco/USA) güçlendirilmiş ışıkla sertleşen kompozit (iElite/Bisco/USA) (Grup2) ve IPS Empress-II cam seramik (Ivoclar-Vivadent/Liechtenstein) (Grup3), (Grup1,2,3/n=7) kullanıldı. 2.daimi küçük azıya oklüzodistal ve 2.daimi büyük azıya oklüzomezyal Sınıf II kaviteler açıldı. Dişler, 10mm arayla yerleştirilerek hassas ölçü maddesiyle (Optosil-Xantopren/Heraeus-Kulzer/Germany) ölçü alındı, Ni-Cr alaşımdan metal kalıp hazırlandı, alçı daylar üzerinde inley destekli sabit parsiyel restorasyonlar hazırlandı, basma kırılma dirençleri Universal test cihazıyla (Lloyd-LRX Universal/Fareham/England)(1.0mm/dk, 250 kgf yükleme kapasitesi) test edildi. Veriler, Tek-yönlü ANOVA ve Duncan-Çoklu Karşılaştırma Testleriyle istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi (p<0,05). Bulgular: Grup2 (359,504±43,940N) ve Grup3 (304,286±100,667N) grupları arasında istatistiksel farklılık gözlenmedi (p>0.05). Grupl'den sağlanan kırılma direnci değerleri (463,914±82,738N), diğer gruplardan sağlanan değerlerden (359,504±43,940N), (304,286±100,667N) istatistiksel olarak yüksek bulundu (p<0.05). Örneklerde genel olarak koheziv kırık tipine rastlandı. Sonuç: Çalışmada 2.daimi küçük azı ve 2.daimi büyük azı dişlerinde hazırlanan Sınıf II kavitelerde, rezin emdirilmiş fiber veya bar şeklinde fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit rezin ve lityum disilikat cam seramikle hazırlanan inley destekli sabit parsiyel restorasyonların tümünün çiğneme kuvvetlerine dayanıklı oldukları ve kayıp daimi dişlerin/dokularının restore edilmesi amacıyla kullanılabilecekleri fikrine varıldı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ftberle-guclendtrtlmts-kompoztt-seramtkle-hazirlanan-sabtt-restorasyonlarin-kirilma-dtrenclertntn-degerlendtrtlmest.pdf
  • 2
100-110
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent
1998;80(4):450-6.
2- Odman P, Andersson B. Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective
clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14(6):504-9.
3- Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int
2002;33(7):503-10.
4- Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses:Up to 8 years results.
Dent Mater 2009;25(9):e63-71.
5- Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 2003;31(8):521-5.
6- Cronin RJ, Cagna DR. An update on fixed
prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128(4):425-36.
7- Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fijimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. Elsevier,
Saint Louis, p.135-67, 1995
8- Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett L, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Quintessence, Chicago, p.119-37, 171-4, 1997.
9- Kılıçarslan MA, Kedici PS, Küçükeşmen HC, Uludağ BC. In vitro fracture resistance of posterior metal-ceramic and all-ceramic inlay-retained resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent
2004;92(4):365-70.
10- Imbery TA, Eshelman EG. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A review of three decades of
progress. JADA 1996;127(12):1751-60.
11- McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the
child and adolescent. 7th ed. Elsevier, St Louis, p.543-
65, 1999.
12- Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M,
Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J
Prosthodont 2001;14(3):231-8.
13- Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R,
Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of polyethylene-fibre-reinforced-composite versus glass-fibre-reinforced-composite
fixed partial denture. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(7):668-74.
14- Losse M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J
Prosthodont Restor Dent 1998;6(2):55-62.
15- Vallittu PK, Sevelius C. Resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: a
clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84(4):413-8.
16- Xie Q, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-
Fiberle Güçlendirilmiş Kompozit ve Seramikle
Hazırlanan Sabit Restorasyonlar
108
Süleyman
Demire
l Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg
Cilt/Vol.:2 Sayı/No.:2 Sayfa/Page:100-110, 2010
reinforced composite FPDs with four framework
designs. J Dent 2007;35(7):578-82.
17- Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber-reinforced composites. Quintessence Publishing Co., Hong Kong, p.6,16,30-47, 2000.
18- Kern M, Knode H, Strub JR. The all-porcelain, resin-bonded bridge. Quintessence Int 1991;22(4):257-62.
19- Andersson M, Oden A. A new all-ceramic crown. A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping
with porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51(1):59-64.
20- Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical
fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005;21(5);476-82.
21- Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent
2001;86(5):520-5.
22- Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year
prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 2002;17(3):391-8.
23- Taskonak B, Sertgoz A. Two-year clinical evaluation of lithia-based all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2006;22(11):1008-
13.
24- Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior
FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(4):469-75.
Küçükeşmen, Aka, Küçükeşmen ve Kılıçarslan
25- Wolfart S, Bohlsen F, Wegner SM, Kern M. A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial
dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18(6):497-505.
26- Gohring TN, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: preliminary results after one year. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(6):662-
668.
27- Minesaki Y, Suzuki S, Kajihara H, Tanaka T. Effect of reinforcement methods on the retention of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures using a composite denture tooth as a pontic: in vitro evaluation. J Adhes
Dent 2003;5(3):225-34.
28- Puschmann D, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M.
Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci
2009;117(3):312-318.
29- Mehl C, Ludwig K, Steiner M, Kern M.
Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. Dent
Mater 2010;26(1):67-75.
30- Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Uphaus A, Kern M.
Fracture strength of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater
2007;23(12);1513-20.
31- Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Shehata MK, Marquis PM. The influence of fibre placement and position on the efficiency or reinforcement of fibre reinforced composite bridgework. J Oral Rehabil
2001;28(8):785-91.
32- Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G.
Experiment design of FPD made of all-ceramics and
Fiberle Güçlendirilmiş Kompozit ve Seramikle
Hazırlanan Sabit Restorasyonlar

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com