You are here

FARKLI YAPILARDAKİ IKI FISSUR ORTUCUNUN MİKROSERTLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

THE MICROHAKDNESS EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF FISSURE SEALANTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The microhardness of two different types of fissure sealant materials was investigated in this study. The sealants studied consists of resin based material and glass ionomer cement. The two classes of materials, namely resin and cement, differed markedly in their behaviour. The micro-hardness of the resin based material appeared to increase with time but this effect was offset by the plasticizing action of absorbed water during storage. The microhardness of the glass ionomerfissure sealant was found to decrease over the time. There was statistically high significant values between the microhardness of different type of fissure sealants. The different microhardness values are thought to be due to the differences in the chemical structure of the two materials.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada farklı yapıda iki fissür örtücü materyalinin mikrosertlikleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamına alınan örtücüler reçine esaslı ve cam İyonomer esaslı materyallerdir. Reçine ve siman olarak isimlendirilen bu iki farklı materyalin yapısı gibi polimerizasyonu da farklılık göstermektedir. Reçine esaslı materyalin mik-rosertliği zaman içerisinde artmaktadır ancak, bu etki saklama sırasında emilen olan suyun plastisize hareketi ile dengelenmektedir. Cam iyonomer esaslı fissür örtücünün mikrosertliği zaman içinde azalmaktadır. İki farklı yapıdaki fissür örtücünün mikrosertlik değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak ileri derecede anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır. Mikrosertlîk değerlerindeki bu fark¬lılığın iki materyalin kimyasal yapısındaki farklılıklardan kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir.
77
81

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Aktener O. Cam iyonomer simanlar: 1. sertleşme reaksiyonu ve özellikleri. EDFD 1990;11:153-61.
2. Birkenfeld LH, Moss SJ. Enamel etching before applying glass-ionomer sealant: Microleakage and scanning-electron microscope evaluation. Pediatric Dentistry 1992;15:141.
3. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Status report on the glass ionomer cement. JADA 1979;99:221-6.
4. Boksman L, Gratton DR, Mc Cutcheon E, Plotzhe OB. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as a fissure sealant. Quintessence Int 1987;18:707-9.
5. Craig RG, Peyton FA. Restorative dental materials, 5th ed, London: CV Mosby Co, 1975;169-205.
6. Crips S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD, Characterization of glass-ionomer cemets. A study of erosion and water absorption in both neutral and acidic media. JDent 1980;8:68-74.
7. Donnan MF, Ball 1A. A double-blind clinical trial to determine the importance of pumice prophylaxis on fissure sealant retention. BrDCTit/1988;165;283-6.
8. Earl MSA, Hume WR, Mount GJ. Effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glass-ionomer cement surface. AustDenti/1985;30:298-301.
9. Forss H, Seppa L. Prevention of enamel deminerali-zation adjacent to glass inomer filling materials. ScandJDent Res 1990;98:173-8.
10. Forsten L, Flouride release from a glass ionomer cement. ScandJDentRes 1977;85:503-5.
11. Gerdts GJ, Duke ES, Norling BK. Water immersion and surface hardness of three glass ionomer cements. JDent Res 1985;64:297.
12. Gülhan A, Aykut A, Ulukapı I, Sağlam E. Comparison of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants: 6
months clinical trial. Pedodonti Klinik Araştırma 1995;2(l):22-4.
13. Kuba Y, Miyazaki K, Ichiki K, Kawazoe H, Motokawa W. Clinical application of visible light-cured fluoride-releasing sealant to non-etched enamel surface of partially erupted permanent molars./ Clinc Pediatr Dent 1992;17:3-9.
14. McKinney JE, Antonucci JM, Rupp NW. Wear and microhardness of glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1987;66:1134-9.
15. Peyton FA, Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 4th
ed, St Louis; CV Mosby Co, 1971;58-88.
16. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 7th ed, Philadelphia; WB Sounders Co, 1973;28-54.
17. Seppa L, Forss H. Resistance of occlusal fissures to demiralization after loss of glass ionomer sealants in vitro. Pe-diartic Dentistry 1991;13:39-42.
18. Shimokobe H, Komatsu H, Kawakami S, Hirota K. Cliincal evaluation of glass-ionomer cement used for sealants. JDent Res 1986;65:812 (Abst. 780).
19. Swartz ML, Phillips RW- Clark HE, Long-term F release from glass ionomer cements. JDent Res 1984;63:158-60.
20. Torppa E, Seppa L. Short-term retention of glass ionomer fissure sealants. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1990;86:83-8.
21. Von FraunhoferJA, Suchahampong C. The surface characteristics of denture base polymers, y flenf 1975;3:45-8.
22. Voorde A. Clinical uses of glass ionomer cement: A literature review. Quintessence Int. 1988;19:53-61.
23. Williams B, Von FraunhoferJA, Winter GB. Tensile bond strength between fissure sealants and enamel. J Dent Res 1974;53:74-8.
Farklı Yapılardaki İki Fissür Örtücünün MikroserÜiklerinin İncelenmesi
81
24. Williams B, Von FraunhoferJA, Winter GB. A comparative evaluaiton of the microhordness, water solubility and water absorbtion of fissure sealants. JDent 1975;13:1-8.
25. Williams B, Winter GB. Fissure sealants. Further results at 4 years. Br Dent J 1981;150:183-7.
26. Wilson GS, Davies EH, Von FraunhoferJA. Microhordness
characteristics of anterior restorative materials. Br Dent J 1980;48:37-40.
27. Yao K, Chİen M, Kohara O, Makiko C, Kushida K, Hieda T. Effect of water isolation and early finishing on hardness of glass ionomer cements. / Osaka Dent Univ 1990;24:141-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com