Fen Eğitiminde Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme ve Bütünleştirilmiş Alanlar Yaklaşımı (STEAM)

Adıgüzel, T., Ayar, M. C., Corlu, M. S., & Özel, S. (2012). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik
(FeTeMM) eğitimi: Disiplinlerarası çalışmalar ve etkilişimler [STEM education in the Turkish
context: Interdisciplinary investigations and interactions]. Paper presented at the X. Ulusal
Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Niğde, Turkey. (http://fetemm.tstem.com/
home/sunumveyazilar/yazi1 Erişim Tarihi: 24.03.2016:)
Ananiadou, K. & M. Claro (2009), “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium
Learners in OECD Countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing, Paris.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Armknecht, M. P. (2015). Case Study on the Efficacy of an Elementary STEAM Laboratory School.
A Dissertation submitted to the Education Faculty of Lindenwood University in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education School of Education.
Barr, V. & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and
What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
Barr, D., Harrison, J. & Conery, L. (2011). Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone.
Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
Brown, B. H. & Martinez, D. (2012). Engaging Diverse Learners Through the Provision of STEM
Education Opportunities. Southeast Comprehensive Center, Breafing Paper. http://secc.
sedl.org/resources/briefs/diverse_learners_STEM/Diverse_Learners_through_STEM.pdf
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M. (2014). FeTeMM Eğitimi ve Alan Öğretmeni Eğitimine
Yansımaları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
David A. Sousa & Tom Pilecki (2013). From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to
Integrate the Art. Corwin Press.
European Parlament Communities (2015). Encouraging STEM studies Labour Market Situation
and Comparison of Practices Targeted at Young People in Different Member States. http://
www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_
EN.pdf
Frykholm, J. A., & Glasson, G. E. (2005). Connecting mathematics and science instruction:
Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 127-
141.
Gonzalez, H. & Kuenzi, J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)
education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, August, 2012.
Henriksen, Danah (2014) “Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices,”The
STEAM Journal: 1(2), 1-7. DOI: 10.5642/steam.20140102.15
Jin, Y., Chong, L. M. & Cho, H. K. (2012). Designing a Robotics-Enhanced Learning Content for
STEAM Education2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient
Intelligence (URAI) Daejeon, Korea / November 26-29, 2012
Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2015). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Nedir ve Nasıl Öğretilir?, 3th International
Instructional Technology and Teacher Education Symposium. Trabzon, Türkiye, September
9 – 11, 2015.
Knuth, D. E.. (1985). Algorithmic Thinking and Mathematical Thinking. The American Mathematical
Monthly, 92(3), 170–181. http://doi.org/10.2307/2322871
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education:
Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Servies Reports,
Paper 35, CRS-1- CRS-3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/
Kwona, S., Namb, D. & Lee, T. (2011). The Effects of Convergence Education based STEAM on Elementary
School Students’ Creative Personality. T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.) (2011). Proceedings of the
19th International Conference on Computers in Education. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-
Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
KAYNAKÇA
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 41 (Ocak 2017/I) 101
Fen Eğitiminde Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme ve Bütünleştirilmiş Alanlar Yaklaşımı (STEAM)
Lee, Kyung-Hwa (2005). The relationship between creative thinking ability and creative personality
of preschoolers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 194-199.
Lu, J. J. & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking ACM SIGCSE Bulletin -
SIGCSE ‘09 Volume 41 Issue 1, March 2009 Pages 260-264.
Martinsen, Q. L. (2011) The Creative Personality: A Synthesis and Development of the Creative Person
Profile, Creativity Research Journal, 23:3, 185-202, DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2011.595656
Moye, J. (2011). Putting core academics into context, CTE courses provide an excellent platform
for students to learn the relevance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(STEM) as well as literature, arts, and social studies. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
PDFS/EJ926077.pdf
Namje Park. (2014). The Development of STEAM Career Education Program using Virtual Reality
Technology. Life Sci J 2014;11(7):676-679] (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.
com
National Science Board. (2007). National action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S.
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system (NSB-07-114).
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Oh, J., Lee, J. & Kim, J. (2013). Development and Application of STEAM Based Education Program
Using Scratch: Focus on 6th Graders’ Science in Elementary School. J. J. (Jong Hyuk) Park et
al. (eds.), Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
240, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6738-6_60, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Park, S. Y., Song K. S., & Kim, S. H., (2015). Cognitive Load Changes in Pre-Service Teachers with
Computational Thinking Education. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its
Applications Vol. 9, No. 10, s. 169-178
Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer Education‘s Teaching-Learning Methods Using Educational
Programming Language Based on STEAM Education, In: Park, J., Zomaya, A., Yeo, S., et al
(eds.), 2012; vol. 7513:320-327.
Papanikolaou, K. (2010). Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: Experiences from the
terecop project. Constructivism: Paris. Retrieved from http://hermes.di.uoa.gr/frangou/
papers/eurologo%202010.pdf
Peter J. Denning (2009). The profession of It beyond computational thinking. Communications Of
The Acm, 52(6). DOI:10.1145/1516046.1516054
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2010). Report to the presıdent prepare
and inspıre: k-12 educatıon in scıence, technology, engıneerıng, and math (stem) for
America’s future. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcaststem-
ed-final.pdf (Erişim:20 Mayıs, 2016)
Rabalais, M. E. (2014). STEAM: A National Study of the Integration of the Arts into STEM Instruction
and its Impact on Student Achievement. A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty
of the University of Louisiana Lafayette In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the
Degree Doctor of Education
Resnick, M. & Silverman, B. (2005). “Some reflections on designing construction kits for
kids”, Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘05),
pp. 117–122, DOI: 10.1145/1109540.1109556.
Rotherham, A. J. & Willingham, D. T. (2010). 21st-Century Skills, Not New, but Worthy Challenge.
American Educator, Spring 2010, 17-20.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J. & Houtz, J. C. (2005) The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4),
300 – 314.
Kaan Batı, İlke Çalışkan, M. İkbal Yetişir
Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the
Field. Educational Researcher, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 38–43 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12463051
SoonBeom Kwona , Dongsoo Namb & TaeWuk Leec. (2011). The Effects of Convergence Education
based STEAM on Elementary School Students’ Creative Personality. T. Hirashima et al.
(Eds.). Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education.
Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education
Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda:
An update of state actions. Washington, DC: National Governors Association (NGA),
Center for Best Practices. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/
pdf/1112STEMGUIDE.PDF
Walker, A. K. & Zeidler, L. D. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through
scaffolded inquiry. International Journal Of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M.S., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Defining
Computational Thinking for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Poster presented
at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2014),
Philadelphia, USA. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/2014/CT-STEM_AERA_2014.pdf
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 366,
3717–3725
Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–36
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S. E. & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing Computational
Thinking in Education. Proceeding SIGCSE ‘11 Proceedings Of The 42nd ACM Technical
Symposium On Computer Science Education. 465 – 470
Yakman, G, (2008). STΣ@M Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education.
Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology. 2008 Annual Proceedings. Netherlands.
Yakman, G. & Hyonyong, L. (2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a
Practical Educational Framework for Korea. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1072-
1086.
Yamak, H., Bulut, N ve Dündar, S. (2014) 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri ile Fene
Karşı Tutumlarına FeTeMM Etkinliklerinin Etkisi. GEFAD, 34(2): 249-265
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.L., Simmons, M.L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based
framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377
Zeidler, D. L. & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues
in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D.
L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science
education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.