You are here

Home » Content

Kavram Haritalarının Değerlendirme Aracı Olarak Kullanılması ve Çoktan Seçmeli Testlerle Karşılaştırılarak İncelenmesi

Using Concept Maps As An Alternative Assessment Tool And Investigation By Comparing With Multiple Choice Tests

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main purpose of this research is to investigate the use of concept maps as an alternative assessment tool in Science and Technology courses. In accordance with this main purpose, the study aimed at scoring concept maps, and comparing concepts in concept maps with the answers given by students to multiple choice test questions related to the same concepts. The participants of this research were 30 seventh-grade students. The results showed that students had difficulties in making connections between the key concepts and creating linking phrases.On the other hand, they answered the test questions related to the same concepts in concept maps correctly. Using structural and relational scoring methods to evaluate the concept maps, the scores showed a significant and strong correlation between these two scoring methods.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın temel amacı fen ve teknoloji derslerinde kavram haritalarının değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanımının incelenmesidir. Bu temel amaç doğrultusunda araştırmada, kavram haritalarının puanlandırılması ve kavram haritalarında kullanılan kavramlar ile aynı kavramlara ilişkin çoktan seçmeli test sorularına verilen öğrenci cevaplarının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma 7.sınıfta öğrenim gören 30 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin kavram haritalarında konu ile ilgili anahtar kavramları birbirleriyle ilişkilendirmede ve kavramlar arası bağlantılar oluşturmada zorlanırken, aynı kavramlara ilişkin çoktan seçmeli test sorularını doğru cevapladıkları tespit edilmiştir. Yapısal ve ilişkisel puanlama yöntemleri ile değerlendirilen kavram haritalarından elde edilen puanlar, iki puanlama tekniği arasında anlamlı ve yüksek bir korelasyon olduğunu göstermiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 157-3350-1-pb.pdf
  • 3
1031
1046
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Atılgan, H. (2007). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Assessment and evaluation in education].
Ankara: Anı yayıncılık.
Barenholz, H., & Tamir, P.A. (1992). Comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction
and assesment. Research in Science & Technological Education, 10(1), 37- 52.
Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E., & Anderson, J.H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of
classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of
Physics, 50, 66–71.
Delgado, J.A., & Rivera, C.A. (2008). Concept mapping as an assessment tool in higher education
activities. The Third International conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia
& Helsinki, Finland.
Demirci, N. (2001). The effects of a web-based physics software program on students’ achievement
and misconceptions in force and motion concepts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Florida Institute of Technology.
Erduran-Avcı, D., Ünlü, P., & Yağbasan, R. (2009). Using concept maps as a method of assessment
in “work - energy” subject. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(3), 427-437.
Eryılmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on
students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001–1015.
Gaffney, K.E. (1992). Multiple assessment for multiple learning styles. Science Scope, 15(6), 54-55.
Hassard, D., & Dias, M. (2009). The art of teaching science. Newyork: Routledge, Taylor& Francis.
Henno, I., & Reiska, P. (2008). Using concept mapping as assessment tool in school biology. The
Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland.
İngeç, Ş.K. (2008). Analysing concept maps as an assessment tool in teaching physics and comparison
with the achievement tests. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1-19.
Jacobs-Lawson, J.M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology
courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25-29.
Lomask, M., Baron, J.B., Greig, J., & Harrison, C. (1992, March). ConnMap: Connecticut’s
use of concept mapping to assess the structure of students’ knowledge of science. Paper presented
at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching,
1046 Sedef CANBAZOĞLU BİLİCİ, Alev DOĞAN, Dilek ERDURAN AVCI...
K. Ü. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23 (3)
Cambridge, MA.
McClure, J.R., & Bell, P.E. (1990). Effects of an environmental education related STS approach
instruction on cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers. University Park, PA:
Pennsylvania State University. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 582).
McClure, J., Sonak, B., & Suen, H.K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: reliability,
validity, and listical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1994). Chemical education research in laboratory environment. Journal of
Chemical Education, 71, 201-205.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983) The use of concept mapping and knowledge
vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education. 67(5), 625-645.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D.B (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Special Issue: Perspectives
on concept mapping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lesson?. The Science Teacher, 60, 50-55.
Ozsevgenc, T. (2006). Determining effectiveness of guided materials about force and motion
unit based on the 5E model for elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education,
3(2), 36-48.
Robinson,W.R. (1999). A view from the science education research literature: Concept map
assessment of classroom learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(8), 2-3.
Rosenquist, M.L., & McDermott, L.C. (1987). A conceptual approach to teaching kinematics.
American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 407-415.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (2004). Examining concept maps as an assessment tool. Concept Maps: Theory,
Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept
Mapping. Spain.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A. & Shavelson, R.J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in
science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, E. S., & Shavelson, J. R. (1996, April). Concept map-based assessments
in science: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the American Educational
Research Association, New York, NY.
Sahin, F. (2002). Kavram haritalarının değerlendirme aracı olarak kullanılması ile ilgili bir.
araştırma [A research related using concept maps as an assessment tool]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,11(1),17-32.
Trowbidge, J. & Wandesee, J. (1994). Identifying citical junctures in learning in a college course
on evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 459- 473.
Uzuntiryaki, U. (1998). The effects of conceptual change text accompanied with concept mapping
on understanding of solution. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East technical University,
Ankara.
West, D.C., Park, J.K., Pomeroy, J.R., & Sandoval, J. (2002). Concept mapping assessment
in medical education: A comparison of two scoring systems. Medical Education, 36, 820-
826.
Yin, Y. & Shavelson R.J. (2008). Application of generalizability theory to concept map assessment
research. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 273–291.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com