Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The case for
constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Bybee, R.W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy. N.H.: Heinemann, Portsmouth.
Colburn, A. & M.P. Clough. (1997). Implementing the learning cycle. The Science
Teacher, 64 (5), 30–33.
Dikici, A., Türker, H. H. & Özdemir, G. (2010). 5E öğrenme döngüsünün anlamlı
öğrenmeye etkisinin incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, 3 (39), 100-128.
Driver, R. & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories – in action: Some theoritical and
empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science.
Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60.
Fredericks, A.D. & Cheesebrough, D.L. (1993). Science for All Children:
Elementary School Methods. Harper Collins Publishers, New York, USA.
Galili, I., Goldberg, F. & Bendall, S. (1991). Some reflections on plane mirrors and
images. The Physics Teacher, 29, 471-477.
Goldberg, F.M. ve McDermott, L.C. (1987). “An investigation of student
understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave
mirror”, American Journal of Physics, 55 (2), 108-119.
Gürses, E. (2006). Durgun Elektik Konusunda Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Kuramına
Dayalı, 5E Modeline Uygun Olarak Geliştirilen Dokümanların Uygulanması
ve Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, K.T.Ü, Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
Heywood, D.S. (2005). “Primary Trainee Teachers’ Learning and Teaching About
Light: Some pedagogic implications for initial teacher training”,
İnternational Journal of Science Education, 27 (12), 1447 -1475.
Jakubowski, E. (1993). The Practise of Constructivism in Science Education. In
K.Tobin (Ed.), Constructing Potential Learning Opportunities in Middle
Grades Mathematic. AAAS Press, Washington.
Kabapınar, F. (2003). “Kavram yanılgılarının ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek bir
ölçeğin bilgi-kavrama düzeyini ölçmeyi amaçlayan ölçekten farklılıkları”,
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 35, 398-417.
Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and development of reasoning. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 14 (2), 169-175.
22 | Anıl ve Küçüközer
Kocakülah, M.S. (1999). A study of the development of Turkish first year university
students’ understanding of electromagnetism and the implications for
instruction. EdD thesis. The University of Leeds, School of Education,
Leeds.
Kocakülah, A. (2006). Geleneksel Öğretimin İlk, Orta ve Yükseköğretim
Öğrencilerinin Görüntü Oluşumu ve Renklere İlişkin Kavramsal
Anlamalarına Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
Köseoğlu, F., & Tümay, H. (2010). Temel Kimya Laboratuvarlarında Öğrenme
Döngüsü Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Kavramsal Değişim, Tutum ve Algılarına
Etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (1), 279-295.
Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R. & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction:
Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skill.
National Association of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 136.
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an ınstructional strategy for
conceptual changes: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 36 (4-5),
357-380,
Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary school
science and beyond. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH
03801-3912.
Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary Science Methods: A Constructivist Approach.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomason Learning.
Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist
classroom. Corwin Press.Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary Science Methods:
A Constructivist Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth /Thomason Learning.
McClintock, C. (1985). Process sampling: A method for case study research
of administrative behavior, Educational Administration Quarterly, 21,
205-222.
Niaz, M. (1995). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry
problems: A dialectic – constructivist perspective. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 32 (9), 959-970.
Nuhoğlu, H., & Yalçın, N. (2006). Fizik laboratuarı çalışmalarında öğrenme
halkası modelinin öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi
(TÜFED), 6, 49-65.
Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning
cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology
students. Science Education, 85 (6), 615-635.
Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, Haziran 2017, 27 (1), 1-24. | 23
Özbudak, Z., & Özkan, M. (2014). İnsanda bazı kalıtsal özelliklerin 5E modeline
dayalı etkinliklerle öğretiminin akademik başarı, tutum ve kalıcılığa
etkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (1).
Öztürk, Ç. (2008). Coğrafya Öğretiminde 5E Modelinin Bilimsel Süreç
Becerilerine, Akademik Başarıya Ve Tutuma Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış
Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual
change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in
the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63 (2),
167-199.
Qarareh, A. O. (2012). The Effect of using the learning cycle method in teaching
science on the educational achievement of the sixth graders. International
Journal of Educational Sciences, 4 (2), 123-132.
Şahin, C., Çalık, M., & Çepni, S. (2009). Using different conceptual change
methods embedded within 5e model: a sample teaching of liquid pressure.
Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational
Studies, 1 (3-4), 115-125.
Trowbridge, L.W., Bybee, R.W. & Powell, J.C. (2000). Models for Effective
Science Teaching, Teaching Secondary School Science Strategies for
Developing Scientific Literacy. An Imprint of Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey.
Ürey, M., & Çalık, M. (2008, December). Combining different conceptual change
methods within 5e model: a sample teaching design of ‘cell’concept and its
oxrganelles. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 9
(2), 1-15.
Van Hook, S. J., & Huziak-Clark, T. L. (2007). Tip-to-tail: Developing a
conceptual model of magnetism with kindergartners using inquiry-based
instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 19 (2), 45-58.
Vincent, D., Cassel, D., & Milligan, J. (2008). Will it float?. Science and
children, 45 (6), 36.
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics
learning. Science Education, 75 (1), 9-21.
Yalçın, F. A., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2010). The effect of 5E learning model on preservice
science teachers’ achievement of acids-bases subject. International
Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 508-531.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri,
4.baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
24 | Anıl ve Küçüközer
Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods, CA: Sage, Beverly
Hills.
Yurdakul, B. (2005). Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler. In Ö. Demirel (Ed.).
Yapılandırmacılık. Pegem A Yayınevi, Ankara.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
