1. Altin T. Buchalla W, Kiclbassa AM, Hehvig E. Curing shrinkage and volumelrie changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995; I ! (6): 359-62
2. Brackclt WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO> Browning WD. Mieroleakage of Class V compomcr and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. J Proslhel Dent 1998; 790): 261-3¬3. Bracken WW, Gunnin TD, Johnson WW, Conkin
JE. Microleakage of light-cured glass4onoiner restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(8): 583-5¬4. Burgess J, Norling B, Summit. J. Resin ionomer restorative materials.: the new generation, J Esthct Dent 1994; 6(5): 207-15.
5. Code; KL, Barkmeier WW, Dentinal shear bond strength, microleakage and gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases. Quintessence Int 1991; 22(6): 467-74.
6. Crim OA. Marginal leakage of visible-light cured glass ionomer restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69(6): 561-3.
7. Kwoldscn NO, Moore BK, Winkler MM. Laboratory testing of type II light-cured glass ionomers as pil/fissurc sealants. J Dent Res 1994: 73(Special Issue): IS4(Abslr. No: 659).
8. Ferrari M, Davidson Cl.. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomcr and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations. Opcr Dent 1996; 21(2): 69-72.
9. Fried! K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid/composite- sandwich restorations. Opcr Dent 1997; 22(1): 21-9.
10. Grande RHM. Ballester RY, Singer JM, Santos JFF. Microleakage of a universal adhesive used as a fissure sealant. Am J Dent 1998; 11(3): 109-13.
11. Hinoura K, Onose H, Matsuzaki M, Kııroda T, Moore BK, Volumetric shrinkage of light cured glass iunomer bases. J Dent Res 1992; 71 (Special Issue): 632 (Abslr. No: 938).
12 Irie M, Nakai H. Marginal scalability of resin modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hvgroscopic expansion and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1996; 15(2): 193-200.
13. Irie M, Kakaı M, Hirota K. Marginal gap of light-activated glass- ionomers: effect of hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1992; 71(Spicial Issue); 633 (Abstr. No:941).
14. Johnson LM, Duke ES, Camm J, Hcrmesch CB, Buikema DJ. Examination of a resin-modi lied glass-ionomer material as a pit and fissure sealant. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(12): 879 83.
62
Atatürk Üniv.Dis Hek.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt; 10, Sayırl, Sayfa:60-63,2000
DEMİRCİ, ÜÇOK
15. Martin FE, O'Rotırke M. Marginal seal tooth coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Ausl Dent J 1993; 38(2): IÜ2-7.
16. Optam NJM, Roctcrs JIM, Btirgcrsdijk RCW. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restoralions. Am J Dent 199S; 1 1(4): 160-4.
17. Puckett AD, Fitchie JG, Dennett B,Hembrec JH. Microleakage and thermal properties of hybrid ionomer restoratives. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(8): 377-81.
18. Quinn K An in-vitro investigation into the sealing ability of two fourth generation dentine bonding agents and two resin modified glass polyalkenoatc restoratives. Eur J Fro&thodont Res Dent 1995; 3(3):
i
19-25.
19. Sidhu SK. Sealing effectiveness of light-cured glass ionomer cement liners. J Prosthel Dent 1992; 68(6): 891-4.
20. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ, In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. OperDcnt 1992; 17(1 J; 7-12.
21. Sidhu'SK, Watson TF. Fluid permeability and otherinterfacial characteristics of light cured-glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1994; 73 (Special Issue): 183 (Abstr.No:651).
22. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Rcsin-modilied glass ionomer materials. A status report, for the American Journal of Dentistry- Am J Dent 1995: 8(1): 59-67.
23. Sidlw SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. The effect of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modificd glass-ionomer restorations, J Dent Res 1997; 76(S): 1495 1501.
24. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121(6): 706-10.'
25. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorlo R, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomcr restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81(5): 610-£5,
26. Tolidis K, Nohccourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polimerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater 1998; 14(6): 417-23.
27. Watson TF. A confoeal microscopical study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a llght-ctircd glass ionomer to tooth tissue. J Dent Res 1990; 69(8): 1531-8.
28. Watson T. Sidhu S, Griffiths B.fonomer.s vs. composites at the tooth interface. In: Hunt PR, Hd. Glass Ionomers: The next generation. Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers, Pennsylvania: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC; 1994: 123-130.
29. Yap ALT, Ho KS, Wong KM. Comparison of marginal seaiing ability of new generation bonding systems. J Orel Rehabil 1998: 25(9): 666-71.
3Ü.
Ya
p AUJ, Lim CC, Nco JCL. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1995; 26(11): 817-20.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com