You are here

Yüksek Öğrenim Öğrencilerinin Sınav Dönemlerinde Devamsızlık Durumları İçin Sağlık Raporu Talepleri: Kesitsel Prevelans Çalışması

Demand For Sickness Certificate To Cover Absenteeism in Examinations in Postgraduate Education: A Cross- Sectinal Prevalence Study

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Background: This study was designed to evaluate the postgraduate students’ behavior in demanding sickness certificates for rest in examination periods. Methods: A characteristic of sickness certificate was to present an excuse for absenteeism in the mid-term examinations, provided to 14 graduate and 9 undergraduate schools were analyzed quantitatively. Results: The 80.1% (1795) of reports were prescribed for graduate students and of them most frequently delivered sickness certifications were faculty of engineering and faculty of science respectively (786 students 35.1% and 435 students 19.4% respectively). Conclusion: The coexistence of providing sickness certificates for rest in periods in which examinations are concentrated and proposing short periods of rest strongly suggests that nonmedical reasons are mostly cause of prescribing rest to cover absenteeism.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışma, yüksek öğrenim öğrencilerinin sınav dönemlerinde sağlık raporu taleplerini değerlendirmek için tasarlanmıştır. Yöntem: Erciyes Üniversitesi’ne bağlı 14 fakülte ve 9 yüksekokulda öğrenim gören yüksek öğrenim öğrencilerinin sınav dönemlerinde almış oldukları sağlık raporları kantitatif olarak incelendi.Bulgular: Sağlık raporlarının %80,1 (1795) oranında en fazla fakülte öğrencilerine, bunlardan da en fazla mühendislik ve fen fakültesinde öğrenim gören öğrencilere düzenlenmiş olduğu bulundu [sırasıyla 786 mühendislik fakültesi öğrencisi (%35,1) ve 435 fen fakültesi öğrencisi (%19,4)]. Sonuç: Sağlık raporlarının çoğunlukla sınavların yoğunlaştığı dönemlerde sınavdan muaf olmayı sağlamak amacıyla tıbbi olmayan nedenlerle kısa süreli raporlar şeklinde düzenlenmiş olduğu görüldü.
633
642

REFERENCES

References: 

Long-Bellil, LM., O’connor’, DM., Robey, KL., Hahn, JE., Minihan, PM., Graham, CL., et
al. (2011). Commentary: Defining Disability in Health Care Education. Academic Medicine,
Vol. 86, No. 9 / September: 1066-1068.
Letrilliart, L., Barrau, A. (2012). Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general
practice and possible solutions: A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract, 18:219-228.
Truog, RD. (2012) Patients and Doctors-The Evolution of a Relationship. N Engl J Med,
366(7), 381-385.
Molewijk, B., Kleinlugtenbelt, D., Pugh, SM., Widdershoven, G. (2011). Emotions and Clinical
Ethics Support. A Moral Inquiry into Emotions in Moral Case Deliberation. HEC
Forum, 23: 257–268.
Steger, F. (2011). Yesterday’s ethics in contemporary medicine – Is it still of concern? Prague
Medical Report, 112 (3); 159–167.
Turkish law of penalty code n: 5237 accepted in 26.9.2004.
http://www.erciyes.edu.tr/tr/index.asp?menu=eBelge&eru_sayfa=yonetmelik (date of access
01.10.2014).
Allen, C., Glasziou, P., Del Mar, C. (1999). Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing
more careful evaluation. Lancet, 354: 1229 – 33.
Dahm, KT., Brurberg, KG., Jamtvedt, G., Hagen, KB. (2010). Advice to rest in bed versus
advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, Issue 6. Art. No: CD007612. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007612.pub2.
Brower, RG. (2009) Consequences of bed rest. Crit Care Med, 37(10): 422–428.
Delaney, JJ., Martin, DP. (2011). The Role of Physician Opinion in Human Enhancement, The
American Journal of Bioethics. Am J Bioet, 11(1); 19-20.
Ubel, PA., Silbergleit, R. (2011). Science and Behaviour. Am J Bioeth, 11(2): W1–W2.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com